Volume 13 Issue 1 2017


Noor Jehan
Assistant Professor Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan.

Naveed Hussain
Sydney Police Australia.

Salma Khan
Bacha Khan University Charsadda Pakistan.

Gohar Saeed
Field research specialist Pakistan Academy for Rural Development.

Abstract The main purpose of the study is to compare the selection criteria of the faculty members to find its effect on the performance of persons selected. The main idea was that the employee delivery of work is linked with the way they are chosen. The research focused on four business institutes of Peshawar. The Data was collected through structured interviews from the heads and registrar while questionnaires from students of the same organization. The study found that there is a similarity in the combination of the faculty while the difference in selection and students’ satisfaction level. It was concluded that the selection process is closely linked to the performance of teachers. The findings imply that the selection process has lasting effects on the delivery of service and it must be dealt with utmost care. The first step in inducting employees necessitates equality of procedure.
Keywords Selection Criteria, Likert scale, Kruskal Wallis H-Test, Teacher Performance
Year 2017
Volume 13
Issue 1
Type Short Report
Recognized by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, HEC
Category "Y"
Journal Name IBT Journal of Business Studies
Publisher Name ILMA University
Jel Classification M54, M51, M10
ISSN no (E, Electronic) 2409-6520
ISSN no (P, Print) 2416-8393
Country Pakistan
City Karachi
Institution Type University
Journal Type Open Access
Type of Review Double Blind Peer Reviewed
Format PDF
Paper Link
Page 125-132
Reference Adem, G., & E. Kahya. 2006. A fuzzy model for competency-based employee evaluation and selection. Fuzzy Sets 22 :( 1-2) 107-114.

Buford, J.A., A.G. Bedian and J.R. Linder. 1995.Management in Extension (3rd edition) Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Extension.

Champion. J. D. 1981. Basic statistic for social Research, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. 2nd Ed. pp (283, 286).

Gatewood, R. D., & H. S. Field. 2001. “Human Resource Selection”. 5th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press. pp. 639-651.

Hogler. L.R., H .Christine, & B.Carol .1998. Internet recruiting and employment discrimination: a legal perspective: Human Reso. Manag. Revi. 8(2): 149-164.

Hanushek, Eric A. 1986. “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools,” Journal of Economic Literature, September, 1986.

Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.

Lindner, J. R., &, C. Zoller 1996. “Recruiting Employees for Small Businesses: A little planning goes a long way, Extension Fact Sheet: Small Business Series”, Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Extension. 23(3): 43-46

Qaisar, 2011. Effects of HR practices on performance of university teachers (A survey on Pakistani private universities)

Posted: Jan 20,2011 practices-on-performance-of-university-teachers-a-survey-on-pakistani-private- universities-4074709.html#ixzz1q0xy0XbU

Rockoff, J.E.2003. The impact of individual teachers on students’ achievements; evidence from panel data. A project submitted to Harvard university.

Shahzad, K., S. Bashir and I.M. Ramay. 2008. Impact of HR Practices on Perceived Performance of University Teachers in Pakistan, International Review of Business Research Papers Vol. 4 No.2 March 2008 Pp.302-315.

Tessema, M. and Soeters, J. 2006. Challenges and prospects of HRM in developing countries: testing the HRM-performance link in Eritrean civil service,International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 86-105.

William, B. R. Werther, J. R. K. Davis. 2000. HR and Personnel Management. 5th Ed. pp.120-127.