IMPACT OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ORGANIZATION INNOVATIVE CAPABILITIES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE - MEDIATING IMPACT OF CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Download

Volume 13 Issue 2 2017

Author(s):

Amna Hasnain
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
amnahussain12@gmail.com

Muhammad Sadiq Shahid
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
sshahidmalik@bzu.edu.pk

M. Khuram Khalil
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
khuram.khalil@gmail.com

Zeeshan Ahmad Qureshi
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
zeeshan_ahmed@hotmail.com

Abstract The main purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating impact of corporate entrepreneurship on the relationship between knowledge sharing, organizational innovational capabilities, and firm performance. The rapid technological change and the world is a global village have forced organizations to change their way of doing business. Organizations require developing new products, improving the production process, and capturing new markets to survive against local and international competition. Pakistani organizations are losing their market share in local and international markets due to their inability to meet continuously increasing customer demands. This study will helps these organizations to understand the importance of knowledge sharing, innovation, and corporate entrepreneurship in their performance. The data were collected from service sector industries by using a close-ended questionnaire. Results show that knowledge sharing and organizational innovative capabilities have a positive impact on firm performance while corporate entrepreneurship more strengthens this impact. It is recommended for organizations to create a knowledge sharing environment in the organization through awareness sessions and to teach employees how knowledge sharing can collectively benefit them and the organization. Organizational culture should welcome new ideas and opportunities and strive to achieve continuous excellence.
Keywords Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Innovation Capabilities, Corporate Entrepreneurship, Firm Performance and Structure Equation Modeling
Year 2017
Volume 13
Issue 2
Type Short Report
Recognized by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, HEC
Category "Y"
Journal Name IBT Journal of Business Studies
Publisher Name ILMA University
Jel Classification G30: G31,G32
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.46745/ilma.jbs.2017.13.02.06
ISSN no (E, Electronic) 2409-6520
ISSN no (P, Print) 2416-8393
Country Pakistan
City Karachi
Institution Type University
Journal Type Open Access
Type of Review Double Blind Peer Reviewed
Format PDF
Paper Link http://ibtjbs.ilmauniversity.edu.pk/journal/jbs/13.2/6.pdf
Page 60-71
Reference Agerfalk, J., Fitzgerald, B., Holmstrom Olsson, H., Lings, B., Lundell, B., & Ó Conchúir, E. (2005). A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development.

Biedenbach, T., & Müller, R. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptive capabilities and their impact on project and project portfolio performance. International Journal of Project Management , 30 (5), 621-635.

Bierwerth, M., Schwens, C., Isidor, R., &Kabst, R. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Business Economics, 1-24.

Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, UK: Tavistock Publications.

Camisón, C., &Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67 (1), 2891-2902.

Cooper, R. G. (2001). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.

Crawford, K., Hasan, H., Warne, L., & Linger, H. (2009). From traditional knowledge management in hierarchical organizations to a network centric paradigm for a changing world. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(1), 1.

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post Capitalist Society. London: Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.

Drucker, P. F., &Maciariello, J. A. (2008). Management (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Collins.

Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.

Frappaolo, C. (2006). Knowledge management. West Sussex, England: Capstone.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.

Hinds, P., & McGrath, C. (2006). Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 343-352) ACM.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research, 6(1), 53-60.

Hurley, R. F., &Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing, 42-54.

Isaksen, S. G., &Ekvall, G. (2007). Assessing the context for change: A technical manual for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. The Creative Problem Solving Group. Orchard Park, New York.

Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review , 2 (4), 337–359.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43(4), 443-477.

Keenan, J., &Aggestam, M. (2001). Corporate governance and intellectual capital some conceptualisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review , 9 (4), 259-275.

Kuratko, D. F., Goldsby, M. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2012). Innovation acceleration: Transforming organizational thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Law, C. C., & Ngai, E. W. (2008). An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviors on firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications , 34 (4), 2342-2349.

Lin, S. J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). Configuring a corporate venturing portfolio to create growth value: Within-portfolio diversity and strategic linkage. Journal of Business Venturing , 26 (4), 489-503.

Onağ, A. O., Tepeci, M., &Baºalp, A. A. (2014). Organizational Learning Capability and its Impact on Firm Innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 708717.

Özdemirci, A. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategy process: A performance based research on Istanbul market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 611-626.

Phan, P. H., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Tan, W. L. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing , 24 (3), 197205.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation, 5th ed., New York, NY: Free Press.

Russell, R. D. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: A cognitive mapping approach. Theory and Practice , 23 (3), 65-65.

Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., &Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 29(4), 358-373.

Schneckenberg, D., Truong, Y., &Mazloomi, H. (2015). Microfoundations of innovative capabilities: The leverage of collaborative technologies on organizational learning and knowledge management in a multinational corporation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 356-368.

Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information &Management , 41, 933–945.

Sher, J., & Yang, Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Technovation , 25 (1), 33-43.

Simsek, Z., &Heavey, C. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge-based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small-to medium-sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal , 5 (1), 81-100.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology , 13, 290-312.

Teng, B. S. (2007). Corporate Entrepreneurship Activities through Strategic Alliances: A Resource Based Approach toward Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 119-142.

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313.

Wang, Q. (1997). R&D/marketing interface in a firm's capability-building process: evidence from pharmaceutical firms. International Journal of Innovation Management , 1 (1), 23–52.

Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications , 39 (10), 8899-8908.

Wei Choo, C., & Correa Drummond de AlvarengaNeto, R. (2010). Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(4), 592-610.

Wold, H. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. Multivariate Analysis. Edited by: Krishnaiaah PR. 1966.

Wold, H. (1982). Soft Modeling: Intermediate between Traditional Model Building and Data Analysis. Mathematical Statistics , 6, 333–346.

Wold, H. (1985). Partial Least Squares. In S Kotz, NL Johnson. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences , 6, 581–591.

Zahra, S., Ireland, R., &Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technology learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal , 43 (5), 925–950.

Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., &Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of marketing, 69(2), 42-60.